Alfred C. Snider
Who passed away in 2015 was - Edwin W. Lawrence Professor of Forensics
Director, Lawrence Debate Union
Director, World Debate Institute,
University of Vermont
This article was written in August 2013
It has been a pleasure to watch the growth of Verbattle and the way it has exploded onto the world debating scene. The number of participants in Verbattle places it among the top communication competitions in the world. In many parts of the world, existing debate formats from Europe and America have been adopted or adapted slightly. However, Verbattle is a unique form of debate, discussion, and declaration like no other, which is why I believe it is so popular among the youth of India.
We are educating our youth in academic subjects, but rarely in democratic communication processes for expressing their ideas. The problem may well be that these youth have the ideas and the potential but may not utilize them fully because they have not found their voice.
There are a number of forces that discourage young people from speaking out and taking a full role in our increasingly global participatory democracy.
One of the most powerful factors that can help young people find their voice and make a difference in the future is Verbattle. Students train and compete by discussing topics that are important to them in front of audiences who are astounded by their abilities and insights. The result is that students realize they can express themselves in meaningful ways, that people of influence are willing to listen, and that they can make a difference. Another valuable aspect of the program is that it allows students to experience the fundamental human joy of expression and the sharing of ideas.
There are several facets of the Verbattle format that highlight its special value as a form of debate, discussion, and declamation among young people. As someone who has been involved in educational debating for over forty years, I have identified a number of features that impress me:
Most of us working in this field believe that participation in events like Verbattle has a profoundly positive academic impact on students. However, anecdotal evidence—"isn’t it great?"—is not enough to combat the forces of silence. There must be empirical evidence, and now there is.
A comprehensive meta-analysis conducted by Akerman and Neale for the English-Speaking Union (2011) examined the impact of debate and critical communication on young people. Reviewing over 800 studies, they found that debate participation leads to:
Similarly, Mezuk (2009) analyzed data from Chicago Public Schools and the Chicago Debate League (1997–2006) and found that:
The National Association for Urban Debate Leagues (NAUDL, 2010) also found that participation in debate improves reading test scores, reduces high-risk behaviors, and enhances student attitudes toward higher education.
In Minnesota (2005), a study revealed that:
A 2010 study in Hong Kong by Sam Greenland further challenged stereotypes about debating:
Countless professionals attribute their success to participation in debate activities like Verbattle. Whether in business, law, public service, or other fields, debating has played a transformative role. It should come as no surprise that 64% of the members of the United States Congress were debaters.
Verbattle understands that democracy is not just a form of government; it is also a state of mind.
In democracies, we get the governments we deserve. If voters are passive, accepting, and lack critical thinking abilities, society will continue to stagnate. However, by fostering a new generation of articulate, analytical, and engaged citizens, Verbattle is helping shape the future of India—and beyond.
My congratulations to Verbattle for taking up this challenge and helping young people develop a better future. I look forward to seeing its continued expansion and success worldwide.